Utility services governance and transparency score
Compare utility services governance and transparency score across 50 ISO-mapped countries or territories using one fixed 2024 official-source dataset.
Loading visualization...
Key Insights
- •Coverage: 50 ISO-mapped countries or territories in 2024.
- •Published range: 20.1136358082295 to 82.5757550597191 score.
- •Discovery motivation: Google Trends surfaced the European Commission and GitHub Trending emphasized infrastructure tooling, motivating utility-governance comparison.
Country Rankings
Top 10 Countries
Bottom 10 Countries
Data Analysis
Value Distribution
How countries are distributed across the value range
Regional Comparison
Average values by world region (Global avg: 59.5score)
About This Statistic
B-READY focuses on ten topics that are organized following the life cycle of the firm and its participation in the market while opening, operating (or expanding), and closing (or reorganizing) a business. The Utility Services topic measures the effectiveness of regulatory frameworks, and the quality of governance and transparency of service delivery mechanisms, as well as the operational efficiency of providing electricity, water, and internet services. The second pillar of the topic measures the quality of governance and transparency in the provision of utility services, thus assessing the de facto provision of utility services.
MapTheory retains one fixed reference year and unit. Only finite values mapped to ISO 3166-1 numeric codes are included; aggregates, missing values and non-ISO geographies are excluded. No value is estimated, imputed or carried across years.
Methodology
B-READY focuses on ten topics that are organized following the life cycle of the firm and its participation in the market while opening, operating (or expanding), and closing (or reorganizing) a business. The Utility Services topic measures the effectiveness of regulatory frameworks, and the quality of governance and transparency of service delivery mechanisms, as well as the operational efficiency of providing electricity, water, and internet services. The second pillar of the topic measures the quality of governance and transparency in the provision of utility services, thus assessing the de facto provision of utility services.
Full Data
| Rank ↑ | Country ↕ | Value ↕ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Estonia | 82.6score |
| 2 | Slovakia | 82.3score |
| 3 | Hungary | 80.3score |
| 4 | Hong Kong | 78.6score |
| 5 | New Zealand | 77.3score |
| 6 | Colombia | 76.8score |
| 7 | Bulgaria | 76.1score |
| 8 | Croatia | 75.0score |
| 9 | Portugal | 72.7score |
| 10 | Singapore | 71.9score |
| 11 | Romania | 71.3score |
| 12 | Ghana | 71.2score |
| 13 | Rwanda | 70.9score |
| 14 | Peru | 70.2score |
| 15 | United Republic of Tanzania | 69.5score |
| 16 | Montenegro | 69.5score |
| 17 | Mexico | 68.6score |
| 18 | Greece | 67.8score |
| 19 | Togo | 67.5score |
| 20 | Nepal | 67.3score |
| 21 | Costa Rica | 66.7score |
| 22 | Vietnam | 66.6score |
| 23 | Georgia | 65.2score |
| 24 | Botswana | 64.9score |
| 25 | The Republic of North Macedonia | 63.0score |
| 26 | Barbados | 62.7score |
| 27 | El Salvador | 62.5score |
| 28 | Morocco | 61.2score |
| 29 | Cote d'Ivoire | 59.1score |
| 30 | Vanuatu | 55.4score |
| 31 | Sierra Leone | 54.6score |
| 32 | Philippines | 54.5score |
| 33 | Samoa | 54.0score |
| 34 | Indonesia | 52.7score |
| 35 | Kyrgyzstan | 52.6score |
| 36 | Bangladesh | 50.3score |
| 37 | Lesotho | 49.6score |
| 38 | Timor-Leste | 49.0score |
| 39 | Cambodia | 48.9score |
| 40 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 48.2score |
| 41 | Paraguay | 45.2score |
| 42 | State of Palestine | 43.9score |
| 43 | Pakistan | 43.7score |
| 44 | Mauritius | 40.9score |
| 45 | Seychelles | 38.8score |
| 46 | Iraq | 36.6score |
| 47 | Madagascar | 33.2score |
| 48 | Republic of The Gambia | 32.5score |
| 49 | Chad | 29.7score |
| 50 | Central African Republic | 20.1score |
Topics
Data Source
This data comes from World Development Indicators (2024).
View Original Source