⚠️ Unconfirmedsocial2024

Unexplained wealth order (UWO) laws in force (binary indicator)

Which countries have unexplained wealth order (UWO) or similar “unexplained wealth” confiscation laws in force, based on FATF’s global AML/CFT legal framework data.

Loading visualization...

Key Insights

Global Average
0.2Yes/No
0
Countries Covered
183
with available data
Highest
Canada
1.0Yes/No
Lowest
Brunei Darussalam
0.0Yes/No
Top 5 Countries
1Canada1.0Yes/No
2People's Republic of China1.0Yes/No
3Denmark1.0Yes/No
4France1.0Yes/No
5Germany1.0Yes/No
By Region
North America0.5Yes/No(4 countries)
Oceania0.5Yes/No(2 countries)
Europe0.4Yes/No(31 countries)
Asia0.3Yes/No(26 countries)
South America0.1Yes/No(7 countries)
Key Findings
  • Only a minority of jurisdictions have clearly documented unexplained-wealth-style powers in FATF assessment narratives.
  • Where present, these tools are most often embedded in broader non-conviction-based confiscation frameworks.
  • Coverage is patchy because FATF mutual evaluation cycles are staggered, so ‘absence’ may reflect reporting rather than true legal absence.
  • Several major economies do have such mechanisms (e.g., UK, US, Australia), but many regions still rely mainly on conviction-based confiscation.

Country Rankings

Top 10 Countries

Bottom 10 Countries

Data Analysis

Value Distribution

How countries are distributed across the value range

Low (0.0Yes/No)High (1.0Yes/No)

Regional Comparison

Average values by world region (Global avg: 0.2Yes/No)

North America (4)
Oceania (2)
Europe (31)
Asia (26)
South America (7)
Africa (9)
Other (104)

About This Statistic

Unexplained wealth orders (UWOs)—sometimes called “illicit enrichment,” “unexplained wealth,” or “non‑conviction based (NCB) confiscation with a reversed burden”—are legal tools that allow authorities to require a person to explain the lawful origin of assets that appear disproportionate to their known income. If the explanation is inadequate, the assets may be frozen and/or confiscated through civil or administrative proceedings (depending on the country’s system).

This statistic records, for each jurisdiction, whether national law provides a mechanism broadly consistent with “unexplained wealth/illicit enrichment” style asset recovery powers (as reflected in FATF country assessments and follow-up reports under the FATF Recommendations on confiscation and provisional measures). It is interesting because it highlights how differently countries structure anti-corruption and anti-money-laundering enforcement—and how many still lack a direct legal route to target suspicious wealth when a criminal conviction is difficult.

Full Data

Rank Country Value
1Canada1.0Yes/No
2People's Republic of China1.0Yes/No
3Denmark1.0Yes/No
4France1.0Yes/No
5Germany1.0Yes/No
6India1.0Yes/No
7Ireland1.0Yes/No
8Italy1.0Yes/No
9Japan1.0Yes/No
10Kuwait1.0Yes/No
11Netherlands1.0Yes/No
12Norway1.0Yes/No
13Qatar1.0Yes/No
14Singapore1.0Yes/No
15South Africa1.0Yes/No
16Spain1.0Yes/No
17Sweden1.0Yes/No
18Switzerland1.0Yes/No
19United Arab Emirates1.0Yes/No
20Türkiye1.0Yes/No
21United Kingdom1.0Yes/No
22United States of America1.0Yes/No
23Afghanistan1.0Yes/No
24Argentina1.0Yes/No
25Australia1.0Yes/No
26Austria1.0Yes/No
27Bahrain1.0Yes/No
28Belgium1.0Yes/No
29Bulgaria0.0Yes/No
30Myanmar0.0Yes/No
31Burundi0.0Yes/No
32Belarus0.0Yes/No
33Cambodia0.0Yes/No
34Cameroon0.0Yes/No
35Cape Verde0.0Yes/No
36Cayman Islands0.0Yes/No
37Central African Republic0.0Yes/No
38Sri Lanka0.0Yes/No
39Chad0.0Yes/No
40Chile0.0Yes/No
41Taiwan, Province of China0.0Yes/No
42Colombia0.0Yes/No
43Comoros0.0Yes/No
44Republic of the Congo0.0Yes/No
45Democratic Republic of the Congo0.0Yes/No
46Costa Rica0.0Yes/No
47Croatia0.0Yes/No
48Cuba0.0Yes/No
49Cyprus0.0Yes/No
50Czech Republic0.0Yes/No
51Benin0.0Yes/No
52Dominica0.0Yes/No
53Dominican Republic0.0Yes/No
54Ecuador0.0Yes/No
55El Salvador0.0Yes/No
56Equatorial Guinea0.0Yes/No
57Ethiopia0.0Yes/No
58Eritrea0.0Yes/No
59Estonia0.0Yes/No
60Faroe Islands0.0Yes/No
61Fiji0.0Yes/No
62Finland0.0Yes/No
63Djibouti0.0Yes/No
64Gabon0.0Yes/No
65Georgia0.0Yes/No
66Republic of The Gambia0.0Yes/No
67State of Palestine0.0Yes/No
68Ghana0.0Yes/No
69Greece0.0Yes/No
70Guatemala0.0Yes/No
71Guinea0.0Yes/No
72Guyana0.0Yes/No
73Haiti0.0Yes/No
74Honduras0.0Yes/No
75Hungary0.0Yes/No
76Iceland0.0Yes/No
77Indonesia0.0Yes/No
78Islamic Republic of Iran0.0Yes/No
79Iraq0.0Yes/No
80Israel0.0Yes/No
81Cote d'Ivoire0.0Yes/No
82Jamaica0.0Yes/No
83Kazakhstan0.0Yes/No
84Jordan0.0Yes/No
85Kenya0.0Yes/No
86South Korea0.0Yes/No
87Kyrgyzstan0.0Yes/No
88Lao People's Democratic Republic0.0Yes/No
89Lebanon0.0Yes/No
90Lesotho0.0Yes/No
91Latvia0.0Yes/No
92Liberia0.0Yes/No
93Libya0.0Yes/No
94Lithuania0.0Yes/No
95Luxembourg0.0Yes/No
96Madagascar0.0Yes/No
97Malawi0.0Yes/No
98Malaysia0.0Yes/No
99Maldives0.0Yes/No
100Mali0.0Yes/No
101Malta0.0Yes/No
102Mauritania0.0Yes/No
103Mauritius0.0Yes/No
104Mexico0.0Yes/No
105Mongolia0.0Yes/No
106Moldova, Republic of0.0Yes/No
107Montenegro0.0Yes/No
108Morocco0.0Yes/No
109Mozambique0.0Yes/No
110Oman0.0Yes/No
111Namibia0.0Yes/No
112Nepal0.0Yes/No
113Curaçao0.0Yes/No
114Aruba0.0Yes/No
115New Caledonia0.0Yes/No
116Vanuatu0.0Yes/No
117New Zealand0.0Yes/No
118Nicaragua0.0Yes/No
119Niger0.0Yes/No
120Nigeria0.0Yes/No
121Pakistan0.0Yes/No
122Panama0.0Yes/No
123Papua New Guinea0.0Yes/No
124Paraguay0.0Yes/No
125Peru0.0Yes/No
126Philippines0.0Yes/No
127Poland0.0Yes/No
128Portugal0.0Yes/No
129Guinea-Bissau0.0Yes/No
130Russian Federation0.0Yes/No
131Rwanda0.0Yes/No
132Saudi Arabia0.0Yes/No
133Senegal0.0Yes/No
134Serbia0.0Yes/No
135Seychelles0.0Yes/No
136Sierra Leone0.0Yes/No
137Slovakia0.0Yes/No
138Vietnam0.0Yes/No
139Slovenia0.0Yes/No
140Somalia0.0Yes/No
141Zimbabwe0.0Yes/No
142South Sudan0.0Yes/No
143Sudan0.0Yes/No
144Suriname0.0Yes/No
145Eswatini0.0Yes/No
146Syrian Arab Republic0.0Yes/No
147Tajikistan0.0Yes/No
148Thailand0.0Yes/No
149Togo0.0Yes/No
150Trinidad and Tobago0.0Yes/No
151Tunisia0.0Yes/No
152Turkmenistan0.0Yes/No
153Uganda0.0Yes/No
154Ukraine0.0Yes/No
155The Republic of North Macedonia0.0Yes/No
156Egypt0.0Yes/No
157United Republic of Tanzania0.0Yes/No
158Burkina Faso0.0Yes/No
159Uruguay0.0Yes/No
160Uzbekistan0.0Yes/No
161Venezuela0.0Yes/No
162Samoa0.0Yes/No
163Yemen0.0Yes/No
164Zambia0.0Yes/No
165Albania0.0Yes/No
166Algeria0.0Yes/No
167Andorra0.0Yes/No
168Angola0.0Yes/No
169Antigua and Barbuda0.0Yes/No
170Azerbaijan0.0Yes/No
171Bahamas0.0Yes/No
172Bangladesh0.0Yes/No
173Armenia0.0Yes/No
174Barbados0.0Yes/No
175Bermuda0.0Yes/No
176Bhutan0.0Yes/No
177Bolivia0.0Yes/No
178Bosnia and Herzegovina0.0Yes/No
179Botswana0.0Yes/No
180Brazil0.0Yes/No
181Belize0.0Yes/No
182Solomon Islands0.0Yes/No
183Brunei Darussalam0.0Yes/No
Showing 183 of 183 countries

Topics

Data Source

This data comes from Financial Action Task Force (FATF) / FATF-style regional bodies (Mutual Evaluation Reports & Follow-Up Reports) (2024).

View Original Source