Unexplained wealth order (UWO) laws in force (binary indicator)
Which countries have unexplained wealth order (UWO) or similar “unexplained wealth” confiscation laws in force, based on FATF’s global AML/CFT legal framework data.
Loading visualization...
Key Insights
- •Only a minority of jurisdictions have clearly documented unexplained-wealth-style powers in FATF assessment narratives.
- •Where present, these tools are most often embedded in broader non-conviction-based confiscation frameworks.
- •Coverage is patchy because FATF mutual evaluation cycles are staggered, so ‘absence’ may reflect reporting rather than true legal absence.
- •Several major economies do have such mechanisms (e.g., UK, US, Australia), but many regions still rely mainly on conviction-based confiscation.
Country Rankings
Top 10 Countries
Bottom 10 Countries
Data Analysis
Value Distribution
How countries are distributed across the value range
Regional Comparison
Average values by world region (Global avg: 0.2Yes/No)
About This Statistic
Unexplained wealth orders (UWOs)—sometimes called “illicit enrichment,” “unexplained wealth,” or “non‑conviction based (NCB) confiscation with a reversed burden”—are legal tools that allow authorities to require a person to explain the lawful origin of assets that appear disproportionate to their known income. If the explanation is inadequate, the assets may be frozen and/or confiscated through civil or administrative proceedings (depending on the country’s system).
This statistic records, for each jurisdiction, whether national law provides a mechanism broadly consistent with “unexplained wealth/illicit enrichment” style asset recovery powers (as reflected in FATF country assessments and follow-up reports under the FATF Recommendations on confiscation and provisional measures). It is interesting because it highlights how differently countries structure anti-corruption and anti-money-laundering enforcement—and how many still lack a direct legal route to target suspicious wealth when a criminal conviction is difficult.
Full Data
| Rank ↑ | Country ↕ | Value ↕ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Canada | 1.0Yes/No |
| 2 | People's Republic of China | 1.0Yes/No |
| 3 | Denmark | 1.0Yes/No |
| 4 | France | 1.0Yes/No |
| 5 | Germany | 1.0Yes/No |
| 6 | India | 1.0Yes/No |
| 7 | Ireland | 1.0Yes/No |
| 8 | Italy | 1.0Yes/No |
| 9 | Japan | 1.0Yes/No |
| 10 | Kuwait | 1.0Yes/No |
| 11 | Netherlands | 1.0Yes/No |
| 12 | Norway | 1.0Yes/No |
| 13 | Qatar | 1.0Yes/No |
| 14 | Singapore | 1.0Yes/No |
| 15 | South Africa | 1.0Yes/No |
| 16 | Spain | 1.0Yes/No |
| 17 | Sweden | 1.0Yes/No |
| 18 | Switzerland | 1.0Yes/No |
| 19 | United Arab Emirates | 1.0Yes/No |
| 20 | Türkiye | 1.0Yes/No |
| 21 | United Kingdom | 1.0Yes/No |
| 22 | United States of America | 1.0Yes/No |
| 23 | Afghanistan | 1.0Yes/No |
| 24 | Argentina | 1.0Yes/No |
| 25 | Australia | 1.0Yes/No |
| 26 | Austria | 1.0Yes/No |
| 27 | Bahrain | 1.0Yes/No |
| 28 | Belgium | 1.0Yes/No |
| 29 | Bulgaria | 0.0Yes/No |
| 30 | Myanmar | 0.0Yes/No |
| 31 | Burundi | 0.0Yes/No |
| 32 | Belarus | 0.0Yes/No |
| 33 | Cambodia | 0.0Yes/No |
| 34 | Cameroon | 0.0Yes/No |
| 35 | Cape Verde | 0.0Yes/No |
| 36 | Cayman Islands | 0.0Yes/No |
| 37 | Central African Republic | 0.0Yes/No |
| 38 | Sri Lanka | 0.0Yes/No |
| 39 | Chad | 0.0Yes/No |
| 40 | Chile | 0.0Yes/No |
| 41 | Taiwan, Province of China | 0.0Yes/No |
| 42 | Colombia | 0.0Yes/No |
| 43 | Comoros | 0.0Yes/No |
| 44 | Republic of the Congo | 0.0Yes/No |
| 45 | Democratic Republic of the Congo | 0.0Yes/No |
| 46 | Costa Rica | 0.0Yes/No |
| 47 | Croatia | 0.0Yes/No |
| 48 | Cuba | 0.0Yes/No |
| 49 | Cyprus | 0.0Yes/No |
| 50 | Czech Republic | 0.0Yes/No |
| 51 | Benin | 0.0Yes/No |
| 52 | Dominica | 0.0Yes/No |
| 53 | Dominican Republic | 0.0Yes/No |
| 54 | Ecuador | 0.0Yes/No |
| 55 | El Salvador | 0.0Yes/No |
| 56 | Equatorial Guinea | 0.0Yes/No |
| 57 | Ethiopia | 0.0Yes/No |
| 58 | Eritrea | 0.0Yes/No |
| 59 | Estonia | 0.0Yes/No |
| 60 | Faroe Islands | 0.0Yes/No |
| 61 | Fiji | 0.0Yes/No |
| 62 | Finland | 0.0Yes/No |
| 63 | Djibouti | 0.0Yes/No |
| 64 | Gabon | 0.0Yes/No |
| 65 | Georgia | 0.0Yes/No |
| 66 | Republic of The Gambia | 0.0Yes/No |
| 67 | State of Palestine | 0.0Yes/No |
| 68 | Ghana | 0.0Yes/No |
| 69 | Greece | 0.0Yes/No |
| 70 | Guatemala | 0.0Yes/No |
| 71 | Guinea | 0.0Yes/No |
| 72 | Guyana | 0.0Yes/No |
| 73 | Haiti | 0.0Yes/No |
| 74 | Honduras | 0.0Yes/No |
| 75 | Hungary | 0.0Yes/No |
| 76 | Iceland | 0.0Yes/No |
| 77 | Indonesia | 0.0Yes/No |
| 78 | Islamic Republic of Iran | 0.0Yes/No |
| 79 | Iraq | 0.0Yes/No |
| 80 | Israel | 0.0Yes/No |
| 81 | Cote d'Ivoire | 0.0Yes/No |
| 82 | Jamaica | 0.0Yes/No |
| 83 | Kazakhstan | 0.0Yes/No |
| 84 | Jordan | 0.0Yes/No |
| 85 | Kenya | 0.0Yes/No |
| 86 | South Korea | 0.0Yes/No |
| 87 | Kyrgyzstan | 0.0Yes/No |
| 88 | Lao People's Democratic Republic | 0.0Yes/No |
| 89 | Lebanon | 0.0Yes/No |
| 90 | Lesotho | 0.0Yes/No |
| 91 | Latvia | 0.0Yes/No |
| 92 | Liberia | 0.0Yes/No |
| 93 | Libya | 0.0Yes/No |
| 94 | Lithuania | 0.0Yes/No |
| 95 | Luxembourg | 0.0Yes/No |
| 96 | Madagascar | 0.0Yes/No |
| 97 | Malawi | 0.0Yes/No |
| 98 | Malaysia | 0.0Yes/No |
| 99 | Maldives | 0.0Yes/No |
| 100 | Mali | 0.0Yes/No |
| 101 | Malta | 0.0Yes/No |
| 102 | Mauritania | 0.0Yes/No |
| 103 | Mauritius | 0.0Yes/No |
| 104 | Mexico | 0.0Yes/No |
| 105 | Mongolia | 0.0Yes/No |
| 106 | Moldova, Republic of | 0.0Yes/No |
| 107 | Montenegro | 0.0Yes/No |
| 108 | Morocco | 0.0Yes/No |
| 109 | Mozambique | 0.0Yes/No |
| 110 | Oman | 0.0Yes/No |
| 111 | Namibia | 0.0Yes/No |
| 112 | Nepal | 0.0Yes/No |
| 113 | Curaçao | 0.0Yes/No |
| 114 | Aruba | 0.0Yes/No |
| 115 | New Caledonia | 0.0Yes/No |
| 116 | Vanuatu | 0.0Yes/No |
| 117 | New Zealand | 0.0Yes/No |
| 118 | Nicaragua | 0.0Yes/No |
| 119 | Niger | 0.0Yes/No |
| 120 | Nigeria | 0.0Yes/No |
| 121 | Pakistan | 0.0Yes/No |
| 122 | Panama | 0.0Yes/No |
| 123 | Papua New Guinea | 0.0Yes/No |
| 124 | Paraguay | 0.0Yes/No |
| 125 | Peru | 0.0Yes/No |
| 126 | Philippines | 0.0Yes/No |
| 127 | Poland | 0.0Yes/No |
| 128 | Portugal | 0.0Yes/No |
| 129 | Guinea-Bissau | 0.0Yes/No |
| 130 | Russian Federation | 0.0Yes/No |
| 131 | Rwanda | 0.0Yes/No |
| 132 | Saudi Arabia | 0.0Yes/No |
| 133 | Senegal | 0.0Yes/No |
| 134 | Serbia | 0.0Yes/No |
| 135 | Seychelles | 0.0Yes/No |
| 136 | Sierra Leone | 0.0Yes/No |
| 137 | Slovakia | 0.0Yes/No |
| 138 | Vietnam | 0.0Yes/No |
| 139 | Slovenia | 0.0Yes/No |
| 140 | Somalia | 0.0Yes/No |
| 141 | Zimbabwe | 0.0Yes/No |
| 142 | South Sudan | 0.0Yes/No |
| 143 | Sudan | 0.0Yes/No |
| 144 | Suriname | 0.0Yes/No |
| 145 | Eswatini | 0.0Yes/No |
| 146 | Syrian Arab Republic | 0.0Yes/No |
| 147 | Tajikistan | 0.0Yes/No |
| 148 | Thailand | 0.0Yes/No |
| 149 | Togo | 0.0Yes/No |
| 150 | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.0Yes/No |
| 151 | Tunisia | 0.0Yes/No |
| 152 | Turkmenistan | 0.0Yes/No |
| 153 | Uganda | 0.0Yes/No |
| 154 | Ukraine | 0.0Yes/No |
| 155 | The Republic of North Macedonia | 0.0Yes/No |
| 156 | Egypt | 0.0Yes/No |
| 157 | United Republic of Tanzania | 0.0Yes/No |
| 158 | Burkina Faso | 0.0Yes/No |
| 159 | Uruguay | 0.0Yes/No |
| 160 | Uzbekistan | 0.0Yes/No |
| 161 | Venezuela | 0.0Yes/No |
| 162 | Samoa | 0.0Yes/No |
| 163 | Yemen | 0.0Yes/No |
| 164 | Zambia | 0.0Yes/No |
| 165 | Albania | 0.0Yes/No |
| 166 | Algeria | 0.0Yes/No |
| 167 | Andorra | 0.0Yes/No |
| 168 | Angola | 0.0Yes/No |
| 169 | Antigua and Barbuda | 0.0Yes/No |
| 170 | Azerbaijan | 0.0Yes/No |
| 171 | Bahamas | 0.0Yes/No |
| 172 | Bangladesh | 0.0Yes/No |
| 173 | Armenia | 0.0Yes/No |
| 174 | Barbados | 0.0Yes/No |
| 175 | Bermuda | 0.0Yes/No |
| 176 | Bhutan | 0.0Yes/No |
| 177 | Bolivia | 0.0Yes/No |
| 178 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0Yes/No |
| 179 | Botswana | 0.0Yes/No |
| 180 | Brazil | 0.0Yes/No |
| 181 | Belize | 0.0Yes/No |
| 182 | Solomon Islands | 0.0Yes/No |
| 183 | Brunei Darussalam | 0.0Yes/No |
Topics
Data Source
This data comes from Financial Action Task Force (FATF) / FATF-style regional bodies (Mutual Evaluation Reports & Follow-Up Reports) (2024).
View Original Source