⚠️ Unconfirmedenvironmental2020

Share of global forest area under a long-term forest management plan (FRA)

Share of each country’s forest area covered by a long-term forest management plan (%), based on FAO’s Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020.

Loading visualization...

Key Insights

Global Average
26.6%
0
Countries Covered
166
with available data
Highest
Chile
100.0%
Lowest
Brunei Darussalam
0.0%
Top 5 Countries
1Chile100.0%
2Czech Republic100.0%
3Denmark100.0%
4Estonia100.0%
5Finland100.0%
By Region
Oceania87.0%(2 countries)
Europe86.3%(32 countries)
North America54.3%(4 countries)
South America47.1%(7 countries)
Africa13.3%(9 countries)
Key Findings
  • Many European countries report near-universal (close to 100%) coverage of forest area by long-term management plans.
  • A large share of countries in arid regions report 0%, often reflecting limited forest area, limited planning coverage, or data gaps.
  • Large forest countries vary widely—some report broad plan coverage, while others report limited national-level planning in the FRA metric.
  • The indicator highlights governance/planning capacity rather than forest extent—countries with small forest areas can still report 100% coverage.

Country Rankings

Top 10 Countries

Bottom 10 Countries

Data Analysis

Value Distribution

How countries are distributed across the value range

Low (0.0%)High (100.0%)

Regional Comparison

Average values by world region (Global avg: 26.6%)

Oceania (2)
Europe (32)
North America (4)
South America (7)
Africa (9)
Other (87)
Asia (25)

About This Statistic

This statistic measures the percentage of a country’s forest area that is covered by a long-term forest management plan (typically multi‑year plans that guide sustainable use, conservation, monitoring, and harvesting rules). It is a useful proxy for how systematically forests are managed, beyond just how much forest exists.

FAO collects these figures through its Global Forest Resources Assessment (FRA), compiled from official national reporting. Countries differ substantially: some report near-universal coverage of forest area by management plans, while others report limited planning coverage due to capacity constraints, fragmented land tenure, or weak forest governance. Interpreting comparisons requires care because national definitions and plan types can vary, and some countries report “0” when management planning exists only locally or is not captured in national reporting.

Full Data

Rank Country Value
1Chile100.0%
2Czech Republic100.0%
3Denmark100.0%
4Estonia100.0%
5Finland100.0%
6Germany100.0%
7Greece100.0%
8Hungary100.0%
9Iceland100.0%
10Ireland100.0%
11Italy100.0%
12Latvia100.0%
13Lithuania100.0%
14Luxembourg100.0%
15Netherlands100.0%
16New Zealand100.0%
17Norway100.0%
18Poland100.0%
19Portugal100.0%
20Slovakia100.0%
21Slovenia100.0%
22Sweden100.0%
23Switzerland100.0%
24United Kingdom100.0%
25Algeria100.0%
26Austria100.0%
27Belgium100.0%
28Croatia93.0%
29Canada88.0%
30Spain85.0%
31Uruguay85.0%
32United States of America79.0%
33France75.0%
34Australia74.0%
35Greenland70.0%
36Peru65.0%
37Suriname65.0%
38Japan60.0%
39Romania60.0%
40Afghanistan56.0%
41Belize56.0%
42Costa Rica55.0%
43The Republic of North Macedonia55.0%
44Serbia50.0%
45Türkiye50.0%
46Barbados50.0%
47Cape Verde45.0%
48Trinidad and Tobago45.0%
49Brazil40.0%
50Mexico35.0%
51Panama35.0%
52Botswana33.0%
53Honduras30.0%
54Colombia28.0%
55Fiji25.0%
56El Salvador20.0%
57Nicaragua20.0%
58South Africa20.0%
59Bangladesh17.0%
60Guatemala15.0%
61Argentina12.0%
62Bolivia12.0%
63Venezuela10.0%
64Bulgaria0.0%
65Myanmar0.0%
66Burundi0.0%
67Cambodia0.0%
68Cameroon0.0%
69Central African Republic0.0%
70Sri Lanka0.0%
71Chad0.0%
72People's Republic of China0.0%
73Comoros0.0%
74Republic of the Congo0.0%
75Democratic Republic of the Congo0.0%
76Cuba0.0%
77Cyprus0.0%
78Benin0.0%
79Dominican Republic0.0%
80Ecuador0.0%
81Equatorial Guinea0.0%
82Ethiopia0.0%
83Eritrea0.0%
84Djibouti0.0%
85Gabon0.0%
86Georgia0.0%
87Republic of The Gambia0.0%
88State of Palestine0.0%
89Ghana0.0%
90Guinea0.0%
91Haiti0.0%
92India0.0%
93Indonesia0.0%
94Islamic Republic of Iran0.0%
95Iraq0.0%
96Israel0.0%
97Cote d'Ivoire0.0%
98Kazakhstan0.0%
99Jordan0.0%
100Kenya0.0%
101North Korea0.0%
102South Korea0.0%
103Kuwait0.0%
104Kyrgyzstan0.0%
105Lao People's Democratic Republic0.0%
106Lebanon0.0%
107Lesotho0.0%
108Liberia0.0%
109Libya0.0%
110Madagascar0.0%
111Malawi0.0%
112Malaysia0.0%
113Mali0.0%
114Mauritania0.0%
115Mongolia0.0%
116Moldova, Republic of0.0%
117Montenegro0.0%
118Morocco0.0%
119Mozambique0.0%
120Oman0.0%
121Namibia0.0%
122Nepal0.0%
123New Caledonia0.0%
124Vanuatu0.0%
125Niger0.0%
126Nigeria0.0%
127Pakistan0.0%
128Papua New Guinea0.0%
129Paraguay0.0%
130Philippines0.0%
131Guinea-Bissau0.0%
132Timor-Leste0.0%
133Qatar0.0%
134Russian Federation0.0%
135Rwanda0.0%
136Saudi Arabia0.0%
137Senegal0.0%
138Sierra Leone0.0%
139Singapore0.0%
140Vietnam0.0%
141Somalia0.0%
142Zimbabwe0.0%
143South Sudan0.0%
144Sudan0.0%
145Eswatini0.0%
146Syrian Arab Republic0.0%
147Tajikistan0.0%
148Thailand0.0%
149Togo0.0%
150United Arab Emirates0.0%
151Tunisia0.0%
152Turkmenistan0.0%
153Uganda0.0%
154Ukraine0.0%
155Egypt0.0%
156United Republic of Tanzania0.0%
157Burkina Faso0.0%
158Uzbekistan0.0%
159Yemen0.0%
160Zambia0.0%
161Albania0.0%
162Angola0.0%
163Armenia0.0%
164Bosnia and Herzegovina0.0%
165Solomon Islands0.0%
166Brunei Darussalam0.0%
Showing 166 of 166 countries

Topics

Data Source

This data comes from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2020).

View Original Source