Government ability to regulate new technologies
Compare government ability to regulate new technologies across 30 countries or territories using one fixed 2023 OECD reference slice.
Loading visualization...
Key Insights
- •30 ISO-mapped countries or territories have a finite Percentage of respondents observation in the fixed 2023 slice.
- •Finland has the highest published value (0.54 Percentage of respondents).
- •Czech Republic has the lowest published value (0.27 Percentage of respondents).
Country Rankings
Top 10 Countries
Bottom 10 Countries
Data Analysis
Value Distribution
How countries are distributed across the value range
Regional Comparison
Average values by world region (Global avg: 0.4Percentage of respondents)
Percentile Profile
The curve shows how values change from the lowest to the highest country. Steep sections reveal inequality or outliers.
About This Statistic
OECD Trust, security and dignity measure 'Governments can regulate new technologies appropiately'. The map uses the exact official 2023 slice in Percentage of respondents; fixed dimensions: FREQ=A (Annual); SECTOR=_Z (Not applicable); EDITION=2025 (2025); SCALE=LIK (Likely); CATEGORY=TDG (Trust, security and dignity); PRICE_BASE=_Z (Not applicable).
MapTheory uses only finite ISO-mapped observations from the fixed 2023 OECD slice recorded below. Aggregates, missing values, non-ISO geographies, conflicting duplicate observations, and every other year or dimension slice are excluded; MapTheory never imputes or interpolates missing countries.
Methodology
OECD Trust, security and dignity measure 'Governments can regulate new technologies appropiately'. The map uses the exact official 2023 slice in Percentage of respondents; fixed dimensions: FREQ=A (Annual); SECTOR=_Z (Not applicable); EDITION=2025 (2025); SCALE=LIK (Likely); CATEGORY=TDG (Trust, security and dignity); PRICE_BASE=_Z (Not applicable).
Full Data
| Rank ↑ | Country ↕ | Value ↕ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Finland | 0.5Percentage of respondents |
| 2 | Mexico | 0.5Percentage of respondents |
| 3 | Switzerland | 0.5Percentage of respondents |
| 4 | Australia | 0.5Percentage of respondents |
| 5 | Netherlands | 0.5Percentage of respondents |
| 6 | Belgium | 0.5Percentage of respondents |
| 7 | Canada | 0.5Percentage of respondents |
| 8 | Denmark | 0.5Percentage of respondents |
| 9 | Colombia | 0.4Percentage of respondents |
| 10 | France | 0.4Percentage of respondents |
| 11 | Luxembourg | 0.4Percentage of respondents |
| 12 | Costa Rica | 0.4Percentage of respondents |
| 13 | New Zealand | 0.4Percentage of respondents |
| 14 | Italy | 0.4Percentage of respondents |
| 15 | South Korea | 0.4Percentage of respondents |
| 16 | Norway | 0.4Percentage of respondents |
| 17 | Spain | 0.4Percentage of respondents |
| 18 | Sweden | 0.4Percentage of respondents |
| 19 | Chile | 0.4Percentage of respondents |
| 20 | Greece | 0.4Percentage of respondents |
| 21 | Estonia | 0.4Percentage of respondents |
| 22 | Germany | 0.4Percentage of respondents |
| 23 | Portugal | 0.4Percentage of respondents |
| 24 | Iceland | 0.4Percentage of respondents |
| 25 | Ireland | 0.3Percentage of respondents |
| 26 | United Kingdom | 0.3Percentage of respondents |
| 27 | Slovakia | 0.3Percentage of respondents |
| 28 | Slovenia | 0.3Percentage of respondents |
| 29 | Latvia | 0.3Percentage of respondents |
| 30 | Czech Republic | 0.3Percentage of respondents |
Topics
Data Source
This data comes from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2023).
View Original Source