Forest area under long‑term management plans (% of forest area)
Share of each country’s forest area covered by a long‑term management plan (%). FAO FRA 2020 shows large cross‑country gaps in planned forestry.
Loading visualization...
Key Insights
- •Several countries report near-universal planning coverage (often 100%) in managed temperate/boreal forest systems.
- •Many tropical forest countries report low coverage, highlighting gaps in formal management planning capacity.
- •The statistic captures forest governance/planning rather than forest quantity—high-forest countries can still score low on planning coverage.
Country Rankings
Top 10 Countries
Bottom 10 Countries
Data Analysis
Value Distribution
How countries are distributed across the value range
Regional Comparison
Average values by world region (Global avg: 33.7%)
About This Statistic
This statistic measures the share of a country’s forest area that is covered by a documented, long‑term forest management plan (often a multi‑year plan specifying objectives, allowable harvest, conservation measures, and monitoring). It is reported as a percentage of total forest area.
It’s a revealing indicator because it doesn’t just reflect how much forest a country has—it reflects governance and capacity: planning, monitoring, and sustained management. High values typically occur where forestry is formalized (commercial and/or public forest administrations), while low values can indicate weaker institutions, limited resources, or large areas of forest outside formal management (including remote or community forests not captured by national planning systems).
Full Data
| Rank ↑ | Country ↕ | Value ↕ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Czech Republic | 100.0% |
| 2 | Denmark | 100.0% |
| 3 | Estonia | 100.0% |
| 4 | Finland | 100.0% |
| 5 | France | 100.0% |
| 6 | Germany | 100.0% |
| 7 | Hungary | 100.0% |
| 8 | Ireland | 100.0% |
| 9 | Italy | 100.0% |
| 10 | Japan | 100.0% |
| 11 | South Korea | 100.0% |
| 12 | Latvia | 100.0% |
| 13 | Lithuania | 100.0% |
| 14 | Luxembourg | 100.0% |
| 15 | Montenegro | 100.0% |
| 16 | Netherlands | 100.0% |
| 17 | New Zealand | 100.0% |
| 18 | Norway | 100.0% |
| 19 | Poland | 100.0% |
| 20 | Romania | 100.0% |
| 21 | Slovakia | 100.0% |
| 22 | Slovenia | 100.0% |
| 23 | Spain | 100.0% |
| 24 | Sweden | 100.0% |
| 25 | Switzerland | 100.0% |
| 26 | United Kingdom | 100.0% |
| 27 | Belgium | 100.0% |
| 28 | Canada | 96.0% |
| 29 | United States of America | 94.0% |
| 30 | Georgia | 90.0% |
| 31 | Austria | 87.0% |
| 32 | Croatia | 85.0% |
| 33 | Serbia | 80.0% |
| 34 | Benin | 78.0% |
| 35 | Moldova, Republic of | 75.0% |
| 36 | Portugal | 75.0% |
| 37 | Greece | 72.0% |
| 38 | Costa Rica | 70.0% |
| 39 | Ukraine | 70.0% |
| 40 | Russian Federation | 65.0% |
| 41 | Argentina | 63.0% |
| 42 | The Republic of North Macedonia | 60.0% |
| 43 | Sri Lanka | 58.0% |
| 44 | People's Republic of China | 55.0% |
| 45 | Mauritius | 55.0% |
| 46 | Bulgaria | 52.0% |
| 47 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 48.0% |
| 48 | Armenia | 45.0% |
| 49 | Malaysia | 35.0% |
| 50 | Tunisia | 35.0% |
| 51 | Cuba | 30.0% |
| 52 | Panama | 25.0% |
| 53 | Türkiye | 25.0% |
| 54 | Bangladesh | 25.0% |
| 55 | Colombia | 22.0% |
| 56 | Thailand | 22.0% |
| 57 | India | 21.0% |
| 58 | Mongolia | 20.0% |
| 59 | Trinidad and Tobago | 20.0% |
| 60 | Albania | 20.0% |
| 61 | Australia | 19.0% |
| 62 | Ecuador | 18.0% |
| 63 | Honduras | 18.0% |
| 64 | Dominican Republic | 15.0% |
| 65 | Kazakhstan | 15.0% |
| 66 | Morocco | 15.0% |
| 67 | Philippines | 15.0% |
| 68 | Uruguay | 15.0% |
| 69 | Botswana | 15.0% |
| 70 | El Salvador | 12.0% |
| 71 | Kyrgyzstan | 12.0% |
| 72 | Mexico | 12.0% |
| 73 | Vietnam | 12.0% |
| 74 | Suriname | 12.0% |
| 75 | Bolivia | 12.0% |
| 76 | Chile | 10.0% |
| 77 | Islamic Republic of Iran | 10.0% |
| 78 | Nepal | 10.0% |
| 79 | Peru | 10.0% |
| 80 | South Africa | 10.0% |
| 81 | Uzbekistan | 10.0% |
| 82 | Angola | 10.0% |
| 83 | Guatemala | 9.0% |
| 84 | Indonesia | 9.0% |
| 85 | Central African Republic | 8.0% |
| 86 | Cote d'Ivoire | 8.0% |
| 87 | Namibia | 8.0% |
| 88 | Ghana | 7.0% |
| 89 | Nicaragua | 7.0% |
| 90 | Uganda | 7.0% |
| 91 | Cambodia | 6.0% |
| 92 | Gabon | 6.0% |
| 93 | Kenya | 6.0% |
| 94 | Rwanda | 6.0% |
| 95 | Myanmar | 5.0% |
| 96 | Zimbabwe | 5.0% |
| 97 | Zambia | 5.0% |
| 98 | Ethiopia | 4.0% |
| 99 | Republic of The Gambia | 4.0% |
| 100 | Malawi | 4.0% |
| 101 | Mozambique | 4.0% |
| 102 | Nigeria | 4.0% |
| 103 | Pakistan | 4.0% |
| 104 | Togo | 4.0% |
| 105 | United Republic of Tanzania | 4.0% |
| 106 | Algeria | 4.0% |
| 107 | Burundi | 3.0% |
| 108 | Cameroon | 3.0% |
| 109 | Guinea | 3.0% |
| 110 | Lesotho | 3.0% |
| 111 | Mali | 3.0% |
| 112 | Paraguay | 3.0% |
| 113 | Sierra Leone | 3.0% |
| 114 | Chad | 2.0% |
| 115 | Haiti | 2.0% |
| 116 | Jordan | 2.0% |
| 117 | Lao People's Democratic Republic | 2.0% |
| 118 | Madagascar | 2.0% |
| 119 | Mauritania | 2.0% |
| 120 | Papua New Guinea | 2.0% |
| 121 | Senegal | 2.0% |
| 122 | Sudan | 2.0% |
| 123 | Burkina Faso | 2.0% |
| 124 | Brazil | 2.0% |
| 125 | Republic of the Congo | 1.0% |
| 126 | Democratic Republic of the Congo | 1.0% |
| 127 | Djibouti | 1.0% |
| 128 | Lebanon | 1.0% |
| 129 | Liberia | 1.0% |
| 130 | Saudi Arabia | 1.0% |
| 131 | South Sudan | 1.0% |
| 132 | Egypt | 1.0% |
| 133 | Afghanistan | 1.0% |
| 134 | Cyprus | 0.0% |
| 135 | Eritrea | 0.0% |
| 136 | State of Palestine | 0.0% |
| 137 | Iraq | 0.0% |
| 138 | Israel | 0.0% |
| 139 | Kuwait | 0.0% |
| 140 | Libya | 0.0% |
| 141 | Oman | 0.0% |
| 142 | Qatar | 0.0% |
| 143 | Singapore | 0.0% |
| 144 | Somalia | 0.0% |
| 145 | Syrian Arab Republic | 0.0% |
| 146 | United Arab Emirates | 0.0% |
| 147 | Yemen | 0.0% |
Topics
Data Source
This data comes from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) — Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020 (2020).
View Original Source