Effective carbon rate on energy-related CO₂ emissions (national average)
Average price signal on energy-related CO₂ from fuel taxes and carbon pricing, measured as €/tCO₂. OECD dataset covers 70+ economies (2023).
Loading visualization...
Key Insights
- •Nordic countries (e.g., Sweden, Norway, Denmark) tend to have among the highest average explicit carbon price signals on energy-related CO₂.
- •Several large emitting economies still price a substantial share of energy-related CO₂ at very low effective rates.
- •Fuel excise taxes (especially on road fuels) often account for a large portion of a country’s ECR, even where explicit carbon taxes/ETS exist.
- •ECR highlights the gap between climate ambition and the strength of day-to-day price incentives faced by households and firms.
Country Rankings
Top 10 Countries
Bottom 10 Countries
Data Analysis
Value Distribution
How countries are distributed across the value range
Regional Comparison
Average values by world region (Global avg: 57.9€/tCO₂)
About This Statistic
The Effective Carbon Rate (ECR) measures the average explicit price put on energy-related CO₂ emissions through a combination of (1) fuel excise taxes, (2) explicit carbon taxes, and (3) emissions trading system (ETS) permit prices. It is expressed in euros per tonne of CO₂ (€/tCO₂) and summarizes how strongly a country’s policies price carbon across fuels and sectors.
This is a useful “reality check” statistic because countries can have climate targets but very different real-world incentives: two places may emit similar amounts of CO₂, yet one applies a high price signal (via taxes/ETS) while the other prices emissions close to zero. OECD publishes ECR values across major economies and emerging markets; coverage is broad but not universal, and values can shift with fuel-tax changes and ETS price movements.
Full Data
| Rank ↑ | Country ↕ | Value ↕ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sweden | 189.0€/tCO₂ |
| 2 | Norway | 183.0€/tCO₂ |
| 3 | Denmark | 170.0€/tCO₂ |
| 4 | Netherlands | 153.0€/tCO₂ |
| 5 | Australia | 129.0€/tCO₂ |
| 6 | Finland | 122.0€/tCO₂ |
| 7 | Switzerland | 116.0€/tCO₂ |
| 8 | Luxembourg | 111.0€/tCO₂ |
| 9 | Belgium | 98.0€/tCO₂ |
| 10 | Estonia | 96.0€/tCO₂ |
| 11 | Iceland | 94.0€/tCO₂ |
| 12 | Slovenia | 92.0€/tCO₂ |
| 13 | France | 87.0€/tCO₂ |
| 14 | United Kingdom | 77.0€/tCO₂ |
| 15 | Ireland | 74.0€/tCO₂ |
| 16 | Latvia | 72.0€/tCO₂ |
| 17 | Lithuania | 68.0€/tCO₂ |
| 18 | Austria | 64.0€/tCO₂ |
| 19 | Czech Republic | 63.0€/tCO₂ |
| 20 | Greece | 62.0€/tCO₂ |
| 21 | Germany | 59.0€/tCO₂ |
| 22 | Slovakia | 58.0€/tCO₂ |
| 23 | Portugal | 57.0€/tCO₂ |
| 24 | Israel | 55.0€/tCO₂ |
| 25 | Spain | 53.0€/tCO₂ |
| 26 | Japan | 45.0€/tCO₂ |
| 27 | Poland | 44.0€/tCO₂ |
| 28 | Hungary | 42.0€/tCO₂ |
| 29 | South Korea | 38.0€/tCO₂ |
| 30 | Canada | 33.0€/tCO₂ |
| 31 | New Zealand | 31.0€/tCO₂ |
| 32 | Romania | 28.0€/tCO₂ |
| 33 | Chile | 24.0€/tCO₂ |
| 34 | Uruguay | 21.0€/tCO₂ |
| 35 | Türkiye | 14.0€/tCO₂ |
| 36 | United States of America | 13.0€/tCO₂ |
| 37 | Colombia | 12.0€/tCO₂ |
| 38 | Tunisia | 9.0€/tCO₂ |
| 39 | Costa Rica | 7.0€/tCO₂ |
| 40 | Mexico | 6.0€/tCO₂ |
| 41 | Thailand | 4.0€/tCO₂ |
| 42 | Russian Federation | 2.0€/tCO₂ |
| 43 | Egypt | 1.0€/tCO₂ |
| 44 | Uzbekistan | 1.0€/tCO₂ |
| 45 | Qatar | 0.0€/tCO₂ |
| 46 | United Arab Emirates | 0.0€/tCO₂ |
| 47 | Yemen | 0.0€/tCO₂ |
| 48 | Country 909 | 0.0€/tCO₂ |
Topics
Data Source
This data comes from OECD (2023).
View Original Source