social2025

CPIA social protection rating

Compare cpia social protection rating across 78 ISO-mapped countries or territories using one fixed 2025 official-source dataset.

Source: World Development Indicators78 countries

Loading visualization...

Key Insights

Global Average
3.0rating (1–6)
Median: 3.0rating (1–6)
Countries Covered
78
with available data
Highest
Cape Verde
4.0rating (1–6)
Lowest
Afghanistan
1.0rating (1–6)
Top 5 Countries
1Cape Verde4.0rating (1–6)
2Grenada4.0rating (1–6)
3Maldives4.0rating (1–6)
4Nigeria4.0rating (1–6)
5Rwanda4.0rating (1–6)
By Region
Key Findings
  • Coverage: 78 ISO-mapped countries or territories in 2025.
  • Published range: 1 to 4 rating (1–6).
  • Discovery motivation: Labor Day dominated the accessible Google Trends view while Wikipedia most-read featured an election, motivating comparison of labor and social-protection policy quality.

Country Rankings

Top 10 Countries

Bottom 10 Countries

Data Analysis

Value Distribution

How countries are distributed across the value range

Low (1.0rating (1–6))High (4.0rating (1–6))

Regional Comparison

Average values by world region (Global avg: 3.0rating (1–6))

About This Statistic

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).

The Social Protection criterion assesses government policies in social protection and labor market regulations that reduce the risk of becoming poor, assist those who are poor to better manage further risks, and ensure a minimal level of welfare to all people. Specifically it evaluates social protection (SP) and labor policies, namely those engaged in risk prevention by supporting savings and risk pooling through social insurance, protection against destitution through redistributive safety net programs and promotion of human capital development and income generation, including labor market programs. It also assesses the functioning of an SP system, including its effectiveness in a crisis and in providing arrangements and incentives to help beneficiaries to move from protection to promotion and prevention, including through interactions with private, informal means of SP. The criterion covers: (a) the overall SP system; (b) social safety net programs; (c) labor markets programs and policies, namely those aiming to promote employment creation and productivity growth while protecting core labor standards and ensuring adequate working conditions; (d) local service delivery and civil society participation in community development programs; and (e) pension and old age savings programs.

MapTheory retains one fixed reference year and unit. Only finite values mapped to ISO 3166-1 numeric codes are included; aggregates, missing values and non-ISO geographies are excluded. No value is estimated, imputed or carried across years.

Methodology

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Social Protection criterion assesses government policies in social protection and labor market regulations that reduce the risk of becoming poor, assist those who are poor to better manage further risks, and ensure a minimal level of welfare to all people. Specifically it evaluates social protection (SP) and labor policies, namely those engaged in risk prevention by supporting savings and risk pooling through social insurance, protection against destitution through redistributive safety net programs and promotion of human capital development and income generation, including labor market programs. It also assesses the functioning of an SP system, including its effectiveness in a crisis and in providing arrangements and incentives to help beneficiaries to move from protection to promotion and prevention, including through interactions with private, informal means of SP. The criterion covers: (a) the overall SP system; (b) social safety net programs; (c) labor markets programs and policies, namely those aiming to promote employment creation and productivity growth while protecting core labor standards and ensuring adequate working conditions; (d) local service delivery and civil society participation in community development programs; and (e) pension and old age savings programs.

Full Data

Rank Country Value
1Cape Verde4.0rating (1–6)
2Grenada4.0rating (1–6)
3Maldives4.0rating (1–6)
4Nigeria4.0rating (1–6)
5Rwanda4.0rating (1–6)
6United Republic of Tanzania4.0rating (1–6)
7Benin3.5rating (1–6)
8Ethiopia3.5rating (1–6)
9Fiji3.5rating (1–6)
10Djibouti3.5rating (1–6)
11Ghana3.5rating (1–6)
12Kiribati3.5rating (1–6)
13Honduras3.5rating (1–6)
14Country 3833.5rating (1–6)
15Cote d'Ivoire3.5rating (1–6)
16Kenya3.5rating (1–6)
17Kyrgyzstan3.5rating (1–6)
18Lesotho3.5rating (1–6)
19Malawi3.5rating (1–6)
20Mauritania3.5rating (1–6)
21Nicaragua3.5rating (1–6)
22Pakistan3.5rating (1–6)
23Saint Lucia3.5rating (1–6)
24Saint Vincent and the Grenadines3.5rating (1–6)
25Senegal3.5rating (1–6)
26Sierra Leone3.5rating (1–6)
27Togo3.5rating (1–6)
28Uzbekistan3.5rating (1–6)
29Samoa3.5rating (1–6)
30Zambia3.5rating (1–6)
31Bangladesh3.5rating (1–6)
32Belize3.5rating (1–6)
33Burundi3.0rating (1–6)
34Cambodia3.0rating (1–6)
35Cameroon3.0rating (1–6)
36Sri Lanka3.0rating (1–6)
37Chad3.0rating (1–6)
38Republic of the Congo3.0rating (1–6)
39Democratic Republic of the Congo3.0rating (1–6)
40Dominica3.0rating (1–6)
41Republic of The Gambia3.0rating (1–6)
42Guinea3.0rating (1–6)
43Guyana3.0rating (1–6)
44Liberia3.0rating (1–6)
45Madagascar3.0rating (1–6)
46Mali3.0rating (1–6)
47Mozambique3.0rating (1–6)
48Nepal3.0rating (1–6)
49Niger3.0rating (1–6)
50Sao Tome and Principe3.0rating (1–6)
51Zimbabwe3.0rating (1–6)
52Suriname3.0rating (1–6)
53Tajikistan3.0rating (1–6)
54Tonga3.0rating (1–6)
55Uganda3.0rating (1–6)
56Burkina Faso3.0rating (1–6)
57Bhutan3.0rating (1–6)
58Comoros2.5rating (1–6)
59Lao People's Democratic Republic2.5rating (1–6)
60Vanuatu2.5rating (1–6)
61Marshall Islands2.5rating (1–6)
62Papua New Guinea2.5rating (1–6)
63Guinea-Bissau2.5rating (1–6)
64Timor-Leste2.5rating (1–6)
65Somalia2.5rating (1–6)
66Sudan2.5rating (1–6)
67Eswatini2.5rating (1–6)
68Tuvalu2.5rating (1–6)
69Solomon Islands2.5rating (1–6)
70Myanmar2.0rating (1–6)
71Central African Republic2.0rating (1–6)
72Eritrea2.0rating (1–6)
73Haiti2.0rating (1–6)
74Micronesia, Federated States of2.0rating (1–6)
75Yemen2.0rating (1–6)
76South Sudan1.5rating (1–6)
77Syrian Arab Republic1.5rating (1–6)
78Afghanistan1.0rating (1–6)
Showing 78 of 78 countries

Topics

Data Source

This data comes from World Development Indicators (2025).

View Original Source