Average effective carbon rate (ECR) on energy-related CO₂ emissions
Average effective carbon rate (€/tCO₂) across energy-related CO₂ emissions, combining explicit carbon taxes, ETS prices and fuel excise taxes.
Loading visualization...
Key Insights
- •Some countries have very high average effective carbon rates largely driven by transport fuel taxation (e.g., Nordics).
- •Many economies have low or near-zero average ECR despite climate targets, indicating limited pricing coverage and/or low rates.
- •The ECR framework lets you compare explicit carbon pricing (carbon taxes/ETS) with implicit pricing via fuel taxes in one metric.
- •Large differences suggest substantial variation in incentives to reduce energy-related CO₂ across countries.
Country Rankings
Top 10 Countries
Bottom 10 Countries
Data Analysis
Value Distribution
How countries are distributed across the value range
Regional Comparison
Average values by world region (Global avg: 65.6€/tCO₂)
About This Statistic
The Effective Carbon Rate (ECR) measures how strongly a country prices carbon emissions from energy use by combining three policy instruments into one comparable figure: explicit carbon taxes, emissions trading system (ETS) permit prices, and fuel excise taxes (net of subsidies) expressed per tonne of CO₂. Because it includes fuel taxes (which exist in many countries even without a formal carbon price), ECR often reveals that many economies already price some emissions—while others leave most emissions effectively unpriced.
This statistic is interesting because it captures the “real-world” carbon price signal faced by households and firms across the energy system, not just the headline ETS or carbon-tax rate. It also highlights big cross-country differences driven by transport fuel taxation, coverage of ETS/carbon taxes, and fossil-fuel subsidy structures. Higher ECRs generally strengthen incentives to shift to efficiency and low-carbon energy, but they can also reflect broader fiscal choices (e.g., long-standing fuel excises) rather than climate policy alone.
Full Data
| Rank ↑ | Country ↕ | Value ↕ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Norway | 260.0€/tCO₂ |
| 2 | Sweden | 230.0€/tCO₂ |
| 3 | Denmark | 210.0€/tCO₂ |
| 4 | Finland | 175.0€/tCO₂ |
| 5 | Netherlands | 155.0€/tCO₂ |
| 6 | Switzerland | 155.0€/tCO₂ |
| 7 | Cyprus | 150.0€/tCO₂ |
| 8 | Ireland | 140.0€/tCO₂ |
| 9 | France | 135.0€/tCO₂ |
| 10 | Luxembourg | 130.0€/tCO₂ |
| 11 | Italy | 120.0€/tCO₂ |
| 12 | Belgium | 120.0€/tCO₂ |
| 13 | United Kingdom | 110.0€/tCO₂ |
| 14 | Slovenia | 105.0€/tCO₂ |
| 15 | Estonia | 95.0€/tCO₂ |
| 16 | Greece | 95.0€/tCO₂ |
| 17 | Spain | 95.0€/tCO₂ |
| 18 | Latvia | 92.0€/tCO₂ |
| 19 | Lithuania | 88.0€/tCO₂ |
| 20 | Germany | 85.0€/tCO₂ |
| 21 | Australia | 83.0€/tCO₂ |
| 22 | Croatia | 75.0€/tCO₂ |
| 23 | Portugal | 70.0€/tCO₂ |
| 24 | Japan | 68.0€/tCO₂ |
| 25 | Canada | 58.0€/tCO₂ |
| 26 | New Zealand | 55.0€/tCO₂ |
| 27 | Slovakia | 55.0€/tCO₂ |
| 28 | Chile | 45.0€/tCO₂ |
| 29 | Poland | 38.0€/tCO₂ |
| 30 | Czech Republic | 32.0€/tCO₂ |
| 31 | Uruguay | 30.0€/tCO₂ |
| 32 | Israel | 28.0€/tCO₂ |
| 33 | Hungary | 26.0€/tCO₂ |
| 34 | Tunisia | 25.0€/tCO₂ |
| 35 | Austria | 22.0€/tCO₂ |
| 36 | Romania | 20.0€/tCO₂ |
| 37 | United States of America | 18.0€/tCO₂ |
| 38 | Costa Rica | 12.0€/tCO₂ |
| 39 | South Korea | 12.0€/tCO₂ |
| 40 | Türkiye | 10.0€/tCO₂ |
| 41 | Mexico | 8.0€/tCO₂ |
| 42 | People's Republic of China | 3.0€/tCO₂ |
| 43 | Indonesia | 2.0€/tCO₂ |
| 44 | South Africa | 2.0€/tCO₂ |
| 45 | Thailand | 0.5€/tCO₂ |
| 46 | Bulgaria | 0.0€/tCO₂ |
| 47 | Colombia | 0.0€/tCO₂ |
| 48 | Russian Federation | 0.0€/tCO₂ |
| 49 | United Arab Emirates | 0.0€/tCO₂ |
| 50 | Ukraine | 0.0€/tCO₂ |
| 51 | Egypt | 0.0€/tCO₂ |
| 52 | Uzbekistan | 0.0€/tCO₂ |
| 53 | Venezuela | 0.0€/tCO₂ |
| 54 | Yemen | 0.0€/tCO₂ |
Topics
Data Source
This data comes from OECD (2023).
View Original Source