Maptheory
social2025

Anti-corruption safeguards for public prosecutors

Compare anti-corruption safeguards for public prosecutors across 42 countries or territories using one fixed 2025 OECD reference slice.

Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)•42 countries

Loading visualization...

Key Insights

Global Average
54.5Percentage of possible maximum score
Median: 58.0Percentage of possible maximum score
Countries Covered
42
with available data
Highest
Latvia
92.0Percentage of possible maximum score
Lowest
Dominican Republic
8.0Percentage of possible maximum score
Top 5 Countries
1Latvia92.0Percentage of possible maximum score
2Canada83.0Percentage of possible maximum score
3Bulgaria75.0Percentage of possible maximum score
4Chile75.0Percentage of possible maximum score
5Croatia75.0Percentage of possible maximum score
By Region
Oceania75.0Percentage of possible maximum score(1 countries)
Europe59.0Percentage of possible maximum score(25 countries)
South America56.6Percentage of possible maximum score(5 countries)
North America50.0Percentage of possible maximum score(3 countries)
Other41.7Percentage of possible maximum score(6 countries)
Key Findings
  • •42 ISO-mapped countries or territories have a finite Percentage of possible maximum score observation in the fixed 2025 slice.
  • •Latvia has the highest published value (92 Percentage of possible maximum score).
  • •Dominican Republic has the lowest published value (8 Percentage of possible maximum score).

Country Rankings

Top 10 Countries

Bottom 10 Countries

Data Analysis

Value Distribution

How countries are distributed across the value range

Low (8.0Percentage of possible maximum score)High (92.0Percentage of possible maximum score)

Regional Comparison

Average values by world region (Global avg: 54.5Percentage of possible maximum score)

Oceania (1)
Europe (25)
South America (5)
North America (3)
Other (6)
Asia (2)

Percentile Profile

The curve shows how values change from the lowest to the highest country. Steep sections reveal inequality or outliers.

0th percentile · lowest100th percentile · highest

About This Statistic

OECD Public Integrity Indicators measure 'Anti-corruption and integrity safeguards for public prosecutors in practice'. The map uses the exact official 2025 slice in Percentage of possible maximum score; fixed dimensions: FREQ=A (Annual); DD_DIM=_T (Total); DD_ID=_T (no label); CRITERIA=_T (Total).

MapTheory uses only finite ISO-mapped observations from the fixed 2025 OECD slice recorded below. Aggregates, missing values, non-ISO geographies, conflicting duplicate observations, and every other year or dimension slice are excluded; MapTheory never imputes or interpolates missing countries.

Methodology

OECD Public Integrity Indicators measure 'Anti-corruption and integrity safeguards for public prosecutors in practice'. The map uses the exact official 2025 slice in Percentage of possible maximum score; fixed dimensions: FREQ=A (Annual); DD_DIM=_T (Total); DD_ID=_T (no label); CRITERIA=_T (Total).

Full Data

Rank ↑Country ↕Value ↕
1Latvia92.0Percentage of possible maximum score
2Canada83.0Percentage of possible maximum score
3Bulgaria75.0Percentage of possible maximum score
4Chile75.0Percentage of possible maximum score
5Croatia75.0Percentage of possible maximum score
6Czech Republic75.0Percentage of possible maximum score
7Lithuania75.0Percentage of possible maximum score
8Peru75.0Percentage of possible maximum score
9Romania75.0Percentage of possible maximum score
10Serbia75.0Percentage of possible maximum score
11Spain75.0Percentage of possible maximum score
12Ukraine75.0Percentage of possible maximum score
13Australia75.0Percentage of possible maximum score
14Costa Rica67.0Percentage of possible maximum score
15Finland67.0Percentage of possible maximum score
16Sweden67.0Percentage of possible maximum score
17France58.0Percentage of possible maximum score
18Germany58.0Percentage of possible maximum score
19Moldova, Republic of58.0Percentage of possible maximum score
20Netherlands58.0Percentage of possible maximum score
21Portugal58.0Percentage of possible maximum score
22Slovenia58.0Percentage of possible maximum score
23Switzerland58.0Percentage of possible maximum score
24Argentina58.0Percentage of possible maximum score
25Italy50.0Percentage of possible maximum score
26Mexico50.0Percentage of possible maximum score
27Slovakia50.0Percentage of possible maximum score
28Austria50.0Percentage of possible maximum score
29Armenia50.0Percentage of possible maximum score
30Ecuador42.0Percentage of possible maximum score
31Norway42.0Percentage of possible maximum score
32Türkiye42.0Percentage of possible maximum score
33Ireland33.0Percentage of possible maximum score
34South Korea33.0Percentage of possible maximum score
35Luxembourg33.0Percentage of possible maximum score
36Brazil33.0Percentage of possible maximum score
37Honduras25.0Percentage of possible maximum score
38Hungary25.0Percentage of possible maximum score
39Indonesia25.0Percentage of possible maximum score
40Guatemala17.0Percentage of possible maximum score
41Belgium17.0Percentage of possible maximum score
42Dominican Republic8.0Percentage of possible maximum score
Showing 42 of 42 countries

Topics

#trend-research-500#oecd#governance-elections-justice-corruption#anti#corruption#safeguards#for#public#prosecutors

Data Source

This data comes from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2025).

View Original Source